March 2007
3/7/2007
POLITICS AND CHANGE
When once voting was a privilege and civic duty that wasn't ignored or dismissed, "politics" has turned into something that is ignored. POLITICS.
Okay, not really politics, per se.
CANDIDATES have turned politics into a dirty, nasty, stomach-turning, infuriating smear of bullshit upon the face of our country. Instead of representing themselves and what they believe and what they would like to do, they take the "National Enquirer route;" embarrass the opponent, smear them, make them look BAD and DIRTY; regardless of the truth.
THIS goes on for how long before an election? Each one attacking the other? Each attack more vicious, more dirty, more inflammatory.... TRUTH be damned.
WE don't live in the age of our parents. THEY mostly voted strictly party line; "If he's Democrat, he's good" or "If he's Republican, he's good."
Then here comes the next generation of voters. We had more information and more immediately, due to television and such, and what did we find out? The TRUST is GONE! Not a single ONE politician was to be trusted; not a single ONE told the truth; politics became a big scam. So, why bother? What difference does it make? Corruption, scandal, lying, misrepresentation; THAT is how politics was viewed. Viewed with cynicism and dismissed as unworthy and/or immaterial.
I admit, I was one of them. I'm older now and I understand more, I know more. However, it's only gotten worse. I see the ads "approved" by candidates; but what do I hear? NOTHING! Well, except why I shouldn't support THE OTHER GUY.
I want to stand up and scream: FUCK YOU! Don't tell me about "the other guy," TELL ME ABOUT YOU! I'LL find out about "the other guy" on my own. AND I'll make MY decision based on FACTS.... NOT what the two of you assholes are saying about each other.
It's no wonder voters in this country abstain. After being bombarded by all the negative, smear advertisements, NO ONE knows WHO to believe and TRUST. But then, we are also a society of "Headlines. NOT Truth." We want all the information and news in a seven to nine minute caplet; otherwise, we lose interest and our attention goes toward idiocy like "Who IS the father of Anna Nicole's baby?"
So, there it is. As a society, we want to be spoon-fed everything. God forbid we have to do any thinking for ourselves. Heaven forbid we do any investigation into those who purport to WANT to serve and represent us. For crying out loud, I'm "this" or "that" and I don't care about the candidate; if it is "MY party" I'm voting.
Politicians consider voters as ignorant, gullible pawns in their own aspirations; it's a sad fact about us that we really do appear to be just that. We seem to often choose the "tried and true" focusing on the past and "what's been" and following the money and prestige instead of seeing the whole picture. The good that what one representative has done is fine to remember...but just because he has done those things, that doesn't mean he is still the best man for the job.
In the case of Robert Byrd, yes he as done some wonderful things for the state of West Virginia; but frankly, HIS time should have ended long ago. He long ago stopped really representing US; he became a "career politician." His only moves and decisions were due to his own political motives.... NOT us.
We are just so against change; not only us in WV, but PEOPLE. I'm sure there are many other representatives who are the same and the voters the same as well. I can understand that to a point.
But, when "LA Law" began to suck, even though it was a Thursday night staple, didn't we stop watching? When our favorite restaurant came under new ownership and we found the food and service not as good, did we not stop patronizing it? When our favorite radio station changed its format to one for which we didn't care, didn't we either turn it off or find another station? When we felt like we could get a better deal with another service (cell phone, insurance, home loan mortgage, credit card, etc.) didn't we switch?
Yet, we cannot seem to do that same thing in matters of politics.
3/21/2007
Male menopause? Mid-life crisis? Do men experience a "male change-of-life?"
Women experience menopause, the transition from the childbearing years to the post-child-bearing years when a major element of a woman's sense of identity is her fertility, her menstruation, her ability to give life and birth to new people; after it, she has to redefine her sense of self to accommodate the knowledge that she is no longer fertile.
It’s a fact of life.
Are men immune and not touched by the aging process? Put any "high opinions" of masculinity aside; there’s a certain truth to the joke that "women reach their sexual peak at the same time men are finding they have a favorite chair."
We’ve all heard about the "male mid-life crisis." It’s when a man of a certain age buys a sports car, changes his entire wardrobe and/or goes for the younger lover.
What IS the male mid-life crisis? Andropause.
Andropause is a medical phenomenon, similar to the female menopause, that can affect men between the ages of 40 and 55. Unlike women, men do not have a clear-cut signpost such as the cessation of menstruationto mark this transition. Both, however, are distinguished by a drop in hormone levels--estrogen in women, testosterone in men. The bodily changes occur very gradually in men and may be accompanied by changes in attitudes and moods, fatigue, a loss of energy, sex drive and physical agility.
Studies show that this decline in testosterone can put men at risk for other health problems such as heart disease and weak bones.
Unlike menopause, which generally occurs in women during their mid-forties to mid-fifties, men's "transition" may be much more gradual and expand over many decades. Attitude, psychological stress, alcohol, injuries or surgery, medications, obesity and infections can contribute to its onset.
Although with age, a decline in testosterone levels will occur in virtually all men, there is no way of predicting who will experience andropausal symptoms of sufficient severity to seek medical help. Neither is it predictable at what age symptoms will occur in a particular individual. Each man's symptoms may also be different.
Dr Malcolm Carruthers - who has worked with thousands of male patients in his London clinic - thinks that the male mid-life crisis is emotional in origin but if severe enough or long enough may have physical consequences, especially if alcohol or drugs are used to blunt the pain of the crisis. Typically, he says, the age group most prone to the crisis is around 40, mainly between 35 and 45, which is earlier than the andropause, which usually starts around the age of 50, say 45 to 55.
So, around the age of 40, AND isn’t THAT a birthday? Commonly considered "over the hill." We realize that we are no longer "young" yet we aren’t really "old." We begin to take stock. What have I DONE with my life? AM I the man I WANT to be? Have I achieved what I thought I would? Have I achieved what I WANTED? WHERE do I stand now?
Dr Carruthers suggests that many mid-life crises go unnoticed and are passed off as the effects of a change of job, a change of house, or a change of spouse. Only occasionally does the drama turn into a full-blown crisis in which the man may feel he is stuck in a career which under- or over-extends him, producing the prospect of burn-out; or in a dead marriage or relationship which gives him the choice of divorce or separation and its consequent traumas, financial ruin, and starting over again. He also lists a number of factors that seem to predispose men to a traumatic mid-life crisis - in essence, these are things that destabilize him from childhood onwards: being born with a sensitive nature, distant or unloving parents, the loss of a parent, especially the father, loss or separation from a loved one or role model, and repeated failure or even repeated success in his career.
Sometimes the things that kept one going are simply not there: the friends move away, the children grow up, leave home and don't visit, the aged parents die, and your body can't keep up with the younger men in sport anymore. It is not surprising that escapist behavior might seem to be the solution: changing job, changing house, changing partner, changing lifestyle, getting the motorbike before it really is too late
Not all men are the same. Some men continue living through the first part of their life and into the second. Others go through a period of great turbulence but then find a new course and approach for the second passage of their lives.
Some of us may have experienced this emotional turbulence; some of us may experience it someday. Dr. Carruthers, in his book, "The mid-life crisis, even when it brings on depression, despair, anxiety or fear, is a time of great challenge, out of which come symbols of transformation. As we age, we human beings yearn for wholeness. We yearn for parts of ourselves that have been in the dark to find sunlight, and those that were sunburned to find shade. We yearn for the parts that have been underdeveloped to grow, and those that were overdeveloped to be pruned. We yearn for the parts that have been silent to speak, and those that were noisy to be still. We yearn for the parts that have been alone to find companionship, and those that have been overcrowded to find solitude. In short, we yearn to live our unlived lives."
Crossing over from one stage of life to another: the young man I was; the grown man I became. What I’ve done, have I done it? What I’ve felt, have I felt it? What I wanted to experience, have I experienced it? The love I sought, did I receive it? The love I wanted to give, did I give it?
The emotional and the physical, it’s facing growing older and WHAT that means. Not just to our own psyches but to our bodies.
It is the effect of an inadequate supply of male hormones in a man's body, an inadequacy which can develop for a variety of reasons as he gets older, and which produces a profound and widespread range of symptoms: it is a crisis of vitality just as much as virility, even though its most obvious sign is loss of both interest in sex and of erectile power; there is often loss of drive in professional or business life...also often fatigue, lethargy, exhaustion and depression, with a sense of hopelessness and helplessness; all too often men change their jobs or their lovers - anything to ease the malaise they feel - usually with little relief....physically, there is often stiffness and pain in the muscles and joints or symptoms of gout and a rapidly deteriorating level of fitness. There may also be signs of accelerated ageing of the heart and circulation.
"The andropause is the explanation of why the vitality and virility of millions of men has faded in middle age or later. It is the explanation of much misery, depression and unhappiness, loss of sexual performance, failing lives, failing health and failing relationships, and above all, it is the cause of impotence and loss of sexual function. But it would be a mistake to see this as merely a sexual issue. Consider the hormone testosterone. It permeates every aspect of the male body, every nerve, every muscle fiber, every brain cell. It is responsible for the development of the male body from the androgynous embryo, which will otherwise develop into the female form. If the testosterone receptors in the fetus are not working, or insensitive to the hormone, the development of the normal features of the male body will be incomplete or abnormal, or an intersex human will grow. If the hormone doesn't make its reappearance at the time of puberty, the male body will not develop secondary sexual characteristics such as a larger penis, beard and body hair, a deeper voice, and a male sexual drive. If the hormone doesn't flow around a boy's bloodstream adequately, his musculature will fail to develop as it should. Only the presence of testosterone in his blood will let him know of his maleness through spontaneous erections, either at night or during the day, and that classic male pre-occupation with sexy thoughts, feelings and images which interrupt a man's more practical thoughts in the way that we are so used to. Moreover, if testosterone doesn't act on a man's brain cells, he will lack drive and ambition, and take fewer risks. Now, what do you think will happen if a man's testosterone levels start to fall at some point in his middle years? Will the areas of the body whose metabolism is so dependent on testosterone remain fully and effectively functional? It hardly seems likely, does it?"
We age. Remember when we were eighteen year-old boys; a subtle wind would cause an erection. "this virility may well have vanished, and spontaneous erections may be but a distant memory. He may still be able to get aroused in sexual situations, but his erection will take longer to get hard, and he will ejaculate more weakly, and he can't ejaculate as often as he once did."
Of course, MANY men will claim to be the exception; God forbid an erection is THE DEFINITION of masculinity or manhood. However, the amount of Viagra sales will prove the point.
In answer to the original question, "Do men experience a change-of-life," the answer is YES. It is partly emotional and partly biological. Is it something to fear or a cause of shame? NO.
We have no power over time and physiology. We WILL age; we WILL change. Fact of life.
What is most important is to accept the inevitable changes that will happen. Examine and understand one’s emotional feelings and reactions to these changes. Being a MAN about them; NOT focusing on one’s penis, erections or ejaculation, but accepting the change that life with inevitably bring to each of us.
3/28/2007
The American Flag.
I remember as a boy in school having the privilege in the morning of raising the Flag and in the afternoon of lowering it. This was something that really MEANT something. In rainy weather, I remember running outside to lower the flag and bring it inside. If one of us accidentally dropped our end of the Flag while folding it at the end of the day, we immediately went to the Principal and said what had happened. The Flag had been defiled; it was burned, as was the proper way of disposition, a new Flag was in place.
An American citizen burning the Flag as an act of protest is an act of TREASON. It's an act of hostility and hatred, disrespect and dishonor. Free speech and being able to peacefully assemble is one thing; an American citizen burning the American Flag as part of a protest over something someone doesn't like is WORSE than U.S. opponents throughout history who have publicly burned an American Flag as a sign of hatred or resentment.
"The Supreme Court addressed the highly emotional issue of flag burning. In Texas vs. Johnson, it reversed Gregory Johnson's conviction for burning an American flag during the 1984 Republican National Convention. The Court concluded that the flag burning was "speech" and again determined that the flag desecration statute was aimed at the communicative impact of Johnson's message. In 1989, the U.S. Congress protested the Johnson decision by passing the Flag Protection Act, a federal version of the already-struck state flag desecration statutes. Thousands burned flags in protest of the new law, and when two protesters were arrested, the Supreme Court affirmed its previous ruling and struck down the federal statute."
"One can't avoid the following conclusion: the black-robed high priests of the Supreme Court trashed the Constitution by handing down Texas v. Johnson. The opinion imposed a fraudulent constitutional mandate on "We the People," the Court's masters. It gave and still gives aid and comfort to enemies of the United States. That's how our Constitution describes treason. In 1866 a Washington newspaper observed that "treason" had "found a refuge in the bosom of the Supreme Court." So treason in the bosom of the Supreme Court is not a new problem."
Our Constitution mandates that the people of every state must enjoy a "Republican Form of Government;" and it also directs that any amendment to it must originate in Congress or in a constitutional convention. The Supreme Court defied both of these provisions and amended the Constitution, against the will of 80 percent of the people, to protect flag burning. Members of Congress have tried, so far without success, to amend it back to the way it was for 200 years, the way the people still want it."
Certainly we all enjoy the benefits of free speech; we are allowed to speak our minds, thoughts and opinions about our government. The First Amendment to the Constitution makes it clear that, among other things, "the right of the people peaceably to assemble."
Is setting fire a peaceful act? Setting fire to OUR symbol of The United States of America? Burning the American Flag to show contempt isn't Free Speech. It's an act of aggression against the United States. The fact that our Supreme Court has allowed it shows nothing more than the "ambulance-chasing" lawyers they once were and politics. What a shame and sad fact that what should be held so dear to us, Our Country is so legally torn apart.
Those who thought our Country were "in bad times" during the 1960s have no idea. Take a look at what our Country is becoming now. If allowed, we, The United States Of America citizens, will be the MINORITY in our own country. We already see it, don't we? NON-citizens receive government welfare, they have jobs for less pay (paid "under the table" by dishonest and UN-American employers,) we natives, born Americans, are expected to learn other languages in order to talk and understand in OUR OWN COUNTRY!
Think about that. People who AREN’T United States citizens, who live HERE and reap the benefits, PROTEST against US. Our own government protects them. United States citizens who question this are considered "heartless and unfeeling." Not so. Those who question, understandably and with every right and reason to feel indignant, aren’t "the bad guys." Those who come here illegally seeking a better life aren’t really "bad guys," either. Who can blame someone for wanting a better life? After all, the United States was founded on immigrants who sought a better life.
However, those who built up our Country held onto personal heritages but they also understood and worked for and at building a New World. Our Founding Fathers created this New World; they built "the land of the free." With excitement and pride, everyone became United States of America citizens.
Now, there are people, immigrants (illegal immigrants who choose NOT to follow the "law of the land") flowing into our Country with NO regard for our laws or society. When once everyone strived to BE U.S. American citizens, now people enter our Country demand that everyone acclimate to THEM. They don’t wish to become a part of the U.S.; they want the U.S. to become THEM. What’s even worse is that our government ALLOWS this.
We see those who are living in our Country illegally protesting, burning our Flag, and speaking out AGAINST everything and everyone in the United States. Then our own Government wants to excuse them and ignores the law; give immunity to people who are living here against the law, who expect our Nation to CHANGE FOR THEM.
What was once the "land of the free," the New World, where everyone could have a place has become the Land of the Ambivalent. No more are we the United States of America; we’ve become "United ONLY IF…."

bravenet.com